ndsharma's blog

Posts Tagged ‘Sanjay Gandhi

At 8-30 PM on January 18, 1977, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi announced over All India Radio – first in Hindi and then in English – that she had requested the President to dissolve the Lok Sabha and order elections, possibly in March. In her broadcast to the nation, she listed the gains of Emergency and said that the restrictions (imposed with the promulgation of Emergency on June 25, 1975) would be ‘relaxed’ to allow political parties to campaign. Two days later Minister of Information and Broadcasting V C Shukla announced the government’s decision not to enforce the censorship (on newspapers).

Though such a move by Indira Gandhi has been in the air for some time, the Opposition leaders were taken by surprise by the timing. Some of them were still in jails. They had launched an agitation against Indira Gandhi under the leadership of Jayaprakash Narayan. The agitation was intensified after the Allahabad High Court judgement in mid-June disqualifying Indira Gandhi. They were all put in jails with the announcement of Emergency.

On January 20, leaders of Congress (O), Jana Sangh, Bharatiya Lok Dal (BLD) and Socialist Party (SP) took stock of the situation and agreed to contest the elections in the name of Janata Party. ‘The process of merger’, they decided, would continue ‘till after the elections’. It was a conglomeration of disparate parties, abhorrent of each other in normal times, but brought together by Indira Gandhi’s Emergency rule.

However, the people were not enthused to the extent the Opposition leaders were expecting. There were those who had seen the ‘gains’ of Emergency; some others were impressed by the leadership qualities of Indira Gandhi and favoured giving her another chance. A friend of mine, who was a fiery critic of Indira Gandhi and frequently brought me the banned literature during the Emergency, remarked that he had now nothing to say against Indira Gandhi and that he did not think the Opposition parties would be able to stay together even if they won the elections. Most important was the feeling of fear, generated among people by Indira/Sanjay Gandhi’s highhanded methods during the Emergency. Those who wanted to vote against Indira Gandhi’s Congress were apprehensive about being victimised if she came back to power. People did not discuss politics or elections in public places and talked to trusted friends only when no stranger was around.

Some change – though very minor, and that, too, among the educated class – was perceptible after January 28. Justice A N Ray had retired as Chief Justice of India on January 28 and M H Beg had succeeded him by superseding H R Khanna who was senior to Beg. In protest Justice Khanna had resigned. During the Emergency no judge would have taken such a risk. There was an impressive crowd at Ram Lila Grounds where Janata Party held its first election meeting on January 30. Chairman of Janata Party Morarji Desai presided, though the main attraction was Atal Behari Vajpayee.

Jagjivan Ram factor

Jagjivan Ram resigned from the cabinet and the Congress on February 2 and formed a new party called Congress For Democracy (CFD) along with Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna and Nandini Satpathy. That changed the atmosphere dramatically as it conveyed the message to the people that Indira Gandhi’s Congress was now a sinking ship. Janata Party’s meetings started swelling in contrast to the crowds in Congress meetings. Indira Gandhi inaugurated her party’s election campaign at Ram Lila Grounds on February 5. Originally it was to be inaugurated by Sanjay Gandhi but Jagjivan Ram’s resignation had obviously pushed him into the background. The meeting was thinly attended. Even those present were not in a mood to listen to Congress leaders. Indira Gandhi had to cut short her speech abruptly as the people were leaving. The next day the same Ram Lila Grounds was overflowing with people come to listen to Jayaprakash Narayan and Jagjivan ram. The BBC, in its 9-30 PM Hindi bulletin called it ominous for Mrs Gandhi. The rest is history.

Narendra Modi today is in the position in which Indira Gandhi was in January 1977. The difference is that he is more powerful than Indira Gandhi then was, more unscrupulous, more devoid of ethics and morality, more ruthless in misusing police agencies against his critics and more megalomaniac. He has a knack for manipulating elections the way Indira Gandhi could never do – even by getting inserted in voters’ lists fake voters in large numbers. In 2014, he was elected from Varanasi Lok Sabha constituency by a margin of 3, 71,784 votes over his nearest rival Arvind Kejriwal of AAP. When a routine revision of the voters’ lists was held by Election Commission in November 2014, over 6.47 lakh fake voters were detected in the lists.

The Opposition parties, the main pillars of a democracy, are in a worse shape than in 1977. They are more apprehensive of each other’s moves than trying to work out an effective strategy to check Modi’s authoritarianism. They need a Jayaprakash Narayan to unite them for a common cause and a Jagjivan ram to push Modi to the defensive. Both appear a distant dream as of today.

Indira Gandhi and the Congress lost the elections held after the Emergency. The Congress split on January 1, 1978; the faction led by Indira Gandhi was recognised by the Election Commission as Congress (I). The ‘Cow and Calf’ symbol of the Congress was frozen and the Congress (I) was allotted the symbol of ‘Hand’. There are two versions of how the Congress (I) opted for the ‘Hand’ symbol.

In his autobiographical political memoir called ‘The Chinar Leaves’, M L Fotedar says that after the formation of the Congress (I), Indiraji had gone to meet Sathya Sai Baba to seek his blessings. Sai Baba raised his hand and said, ‘My blessings are always with you.’ When the Election Commission offered the new symbol to Congress (I), the choice was between a hand and an elephant. Indiraji had the image of Sai Baba’s hand raised in blessing on her mind and so opted for it.

Rasheed Kidwai, however, writes in his book ’24 Akbar Road’, apparently on the basis of his interview with Buta Singh, that ‘Indira was out in Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, with P V Narasimha Rao when Buta was asked by the Election Commission to pick up an election symbol; the choices were an elephant, a bicycle and an open palm. Buta was not sure which symbol he should choose, so he booked a trunk call to seek Indira’s approval. The line was not very clear, or, perhaps, Buta’s Hindi pronunciation was so thick that Indira kept hearing haathi (elephant) instead of haath (hand). She kept saying no to it even as Buta kept trying to explain that it was not the elephant, but the open palm symbol that he was advising her to pick. The comedy of errors continued till an exasperated Indira handed the telephone over to Rao. In a matter of seconds, Rao, master of more than a dozen Indian and foreign languages, understood what Buta was trying to convey.’

Between the two, Fotedar’s version appears more credible. For one thing, Buta Singh was not high enough in the party hierarchy at the time. He was a cheer-leader of Sanjay Gandhi during the Emergency. After the post-Emergency split in the Congress, the Sanjay brigade had noisily supported Indira Gandhi and many of the Sanjay Gandhi supporters were suitably adjusted in the newly formed Congress (I). Buta Singh was appointed one of the AICC general secretaries.

Secondly, Indira Gandhi was never known to take important decisions in this casual manner. She would consult the people around her but once she had made up her mind, she would take the decision and remain firm on it. Besides, she has always been a superstitious woman and had become more so after the Congress debacle in the post-Emergency period. That she should have on her mind Sathya Sai Baba’s ‘hand raised in blessing’ at the time of deciding her party’s election symbol sounds plausible.

The Congress (I) fought its first election under the new symbol for the Delhi Municipal Corporation and won.                      

Congress lost the Lok Sabha elections for the first time in 1977. During the Emergency that preceded the elections, Indira Gandhi had literally abdicated her authority as Prime Minister to her younger son Sanjay Gandhi who was petulant, had little regard for law and had been dubbed as the ‘unconstitutional authority’ in the Indira Gandhi regime.
If the Congress barely mustered 44 members in Lok Sabha in 2014, the blame is put by many Congress leaders – openly by some and in hushed tones by others – on Rahul Gandhi, son of Congress president Sonia Gandhi. Here are accounts of two persons, one close to Indira Gandhi and the other to Sonia Gandhi, on how they perceived the roles of Sanjay Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi.
B K Nehru, ICS and an outstanding administrator and diplomat, was not only a cousin of Indira Gandhi but also her close adviser on internal and foreign affairs. Captain Amarinder Singh, now Deputy Leader of Congress Parliamentary Party (CPP) and former chief minister of Punjab, has had close and prolonged association with (late) Rajiv Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi.

SANJAY GANDHI
I did discuss Sanjay’s doings with Rajiv. He was as discontented, disgusted and depressed with what was happening as was everybody not belonging to the small clique of Sanjay’s buddies and supporters. I asked Rajiv why his mother allowed all this to happen; he said that the fact was that she had abdicated in favour of her son. She exercised none of the powers of the Prime Minister, they had all been delegated to Sanjay. From what I myself had seen it seemed that she was operating as if she were the President and the Foreign Minister. It seemed that she did not know what was happening inside the country. Fori Nehru ( B K Nehru’s wife), not as circumspect as myself… had no hesitation in telling her (Indira Gandhi) of what she had heard in Chandigarh about the compulsory sterilisation of young boys and old men and of the discontent this was causing. To this Indira’s answer was to take her head in her hands and say ‘What am I to do? What am I to do? They tell me nothing.’
–B K Nehru in in his memoirs ‘Nice Guys Finish Second’, quoted by Natwar Singh in his autobiography ‘One Life Is Not Enough’

RAHUL GANDHI
I tried my best at that stage to tell him (Rahul Gandhi) that do not do these elections (inner-party experiments). I spoke to the Congress president, who, too, spoke to him. But he had made up his mind that something had to be put in place and shouldn’t be interfered with. I told him pre-2012 that ‘You will divide each village, which will have its own Youth Congress, and that means it will get divided right to the top; even parents take sides in such a situation, we will have problem’. He didn’t listen and that is exactly what happened.
…She (Priyanka Gandhi) and Rahul have their own abilities and together they can make a very good team to help the Congress president. I have known them since they were children because they studied with my daughter and son. Priyanka is a very determined young lady, you saw the way she carried herself when her grandmother died and when her father died…I have never worked with Rahul because he takes care of the Youth Congress only, though he has been the vice-president for some time.
–Captain Amarinder Singh in ‘Idea Exchange’ in The Indian Express of June 15, 2014

Digvijay Singh has returned to the centre-stage in the Madhya Pradesh Congress. New PCC president Kantilal Bhuria and new Leader of Opposition in the Assembly Ajay Singh (Rahul Bhaiya), both are his protégés. According to the buzz in the party, the new State Youth Congress president is also likely to be Digvijay Singh’s nominee.
There was a perceptible change in the former chief minister’s demeanour and body language when he came to Bhopal to oversee Bhuria’s coronation. The other party leaders were also present to make it a unity show, the only discordant note having been played by Kamal Nath who withdrew from the rally before it reached the PCC office.
The new appointments seem to have unnerved the State BJP. Its leaders had developed a cosy relationship with the outgoing PCC chief Suresh Pachauri who had worked hard to ensure that no embarrassment should ever be caused to chief minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan. The discomfiture of Chauhan and State BJP president Prabhat Jha has of late been reflected in their immoderate language (this is not to suggest that they have hitherto been adherents of the decency in public life). Particularly disturbing to them is the appointment of Bhuria, a tribal from the Dhar-Jhabua region. The BJP has not allowed a tribal leader to gain prominence in the State which has a substantial population of the adivasis.
The 61-year-old Bhuria is the minister of tribal affairs at the Centre where he has not done anything spectacular. He has, however, maintained his grasp at the grassroots, feels comfortable among his people and always gives the impression of being genuinely concerned with the plight of the poor, the adivasis and the dalits. Why he has not been able to do much in spite of his holding important positions is not clear. Maybe, he was helpless before what Rahul Gandhi calls the “rotten system”.
With his charming smile and his artless approach, Bhuria is expected to enthuse confidence among the tribals, dalits and the other poorer sections and thus strengthen the support base of the Congress before the 2013 Assembly elections. His weak point is his inability to establish a rapport with the urban educated class, and especially the media. His prolonged exposure to the Delhi arena (he has been a member of Lok Sabha since 1998) has not made him articulate enough for the purpose of the urban media.
In this respect, Ajay Singh scores over Kantilal Bhuria. Ajay Singh has inherited his father Arjun Singh’s ambition without his erudition, scholarly bent of mind and understanding of politics. Digvijay Singh had entrusted him with important portfolios like tourism, panchayats and rural development in the Congress government but he handled these departments miserably. Equally pedestrian had been his performance as the chairman of the election campaign committee of the State Congress during the period preceding the 2008 elections.
Ajay Singh, however, has good equations with important media persons, mainly by virtue of being Arjun Singh’s son. These media persons can be held responsible to a certain extent for creating delusions of grandeur in his mind. After the rout of the Congress in 2003, he was projected as the next saviour of the Congress as he was sure to be appointed either the PCC chief or the Leader of Opposition. After the appointment of Subhash Yadav and Jamuna Devi to the two posts, respectively, Ajay Singh went into a sulk. In that black mood, he even went so see then BJP president Venkaiah Naidu in Delhi, giving rise to the rumours that he was joining the BJP which his hard core supporters did not deny unequivocally. Later he came out with a facetious explanation that he had gone to see the BJP president to discuss with him water harvesting as the “water is going to be the most scarce commodity and will be the cause of the Third World War it breaks out”.
While his detractors in the party are wondering whether Ajay Singh would be able to win the next Assembly election from his Churhat constituency in the absence of his father (it was a disastrous show in the entire Vindhya region in 2008), Ajay Singh has already started amusing himself and his cronies with the combination of circumstances that would catapult him into the chief minister’s chair after the 2013 elections.
In 1980, he is said to have told his supporters, Sunderlal Patwa of the BJP was the chief minister, Arjun Singh was the Leader of Opposition and a tribal from the Dhar-Jhabua region (Shivbhanu Singh Solanki) was the PCC chief. After the election, Arjun Singh became chief minister. Now Patwa’s protégé Shivraj Singh Chauhan of the BJP is the chief minister, Arjun Singh’s son is the Leader of Opposition and a tribal from the Dhar-Jhabua region (Kantilal Bhuria) is the PCC chief. So after the election, Arjun Singh’s son is going to be the chief minister. (What he fails to mention is that in 1980, Shivbhanu Singh Solanki was the choice of a majority of the MLAs and it was on Sanjay Gandhi’s direction that Arjun Singh was, instead, declared leader of the Congress Legislature Party (CLP).
Ajay Singh’s ambition is being whetted by Digvijay Singh also as he has been saying publicly for quite some time that Ajay Singh is the next chief minister of the State. Digvijay Singh, though, is not unaware of Ajay Singh’s shortcomings. Addressing the gathering at the PCC office after Bhuria had taken charge, Digvijay Singh looked at Ajay Singh and advised him to develop some skills of his father Arjun Singh.

Arjun Singh, who died on March 4 at the age of 81, was a phenomenon in Indian politics; a master in the art of creating illusions which the people took for reality even decades later. He is still referred to as an able administrator; all he had done was to patronise a band of ferociously loyal IAS and IPS officers and administer through them more like an autocrat than a democratically elected leader. He had no patience for the niceties of rules and regulations.
Rajiv Gandhi had, for instance, enacted the law to establish Navodaya Vidyalayas in rural areas with a view to imparting the quality education to village boys and girls at par with their counterparts in the cities. The Act provides for starting a Navodaya Vidyalaya only after the school and hostel buildings, to the prescribed specifications, are constructed. The Centre provides the funds for this. Rajiv Gandhi’s human resource development (HRD) minister P V Narasimha Rao went ahead with the establishment of Navodaya Vidyalayas in States, one in Madhya Pradesh also, in compliance with the law and the rules. Arjun Singh, as HRD minister in the Narasimha Rao government, opened Naovdaya Vidyalayas in Madhya Pradesh by the dozens without a single one having its own school or hostel buildings as per the specifications. At least in one Navodaya Vidyalaya in Rajgarh district, a dilapidated garage hired from an old Congress leader, was being used as hostel for the children. Similarly, as many as 16 Central School teachers appointed at different places in and outside Madhya Pradesh, were attached to the Central Schools in Bhopal city at a particular time. If the Schools where these teachers were supposed to be teaching suffered in the process, it was none of his concerns. (Some of the Arjun Singh protégés were sent to faraway places when Dr Murli Manohar Joshi became HRD minister in the NDA government. Joshi had made the transfer/attachment rules pretty stringent).
Feudal mindset
In fact, Arjun Singh had emerged in Indian politics at a time when the euphoria of establishing a people’s republic for the welfare of the people had started evaporating and a commitment to democratic values was on the decline. He was almost a genius, but he used his genius to subserve his own fiefdom, little caring for the established democratic norms. He was a friend, philosopher and guide to the Muslim leaders but he is not known to have done anything tangible for the uplift of the community; never allowed Muslim leaders to gain importance in Madhya Pradesh. Nor could he reconcile to the emergence of leadership among the dalits, adivasis and OBCs; still, he was hailed as the messiah of the dalits, adivasis and OBCs. The media management was one of his strongest points.
After the 1980 Assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh, he was one of the three candidates for the leadership of the Congress Legislature Party (CLP). A majority of the party MLAs favoured Shivbhanu Singh Solanki, a tribal MLA from Jhabua, but Arjun Singh became the chief minister by taking the help of Sanjay Gandhi who was then calling the shots in the Congress. One of his first acts as chief minister was to enact the law for creating a trust for the management of Bharat Bhavan, the premier multi-arts complex. He made himself and Ashok Vajpeyi, a slavishly loyal IAS officer, trustees ‘for life’, little caring if his action militated against the very concept of democracy. A ‘Note’ for removing this feudal proviso from the Bharat Bhavan Trust Act was prepared by Motitlal Vora when he became chief minister in the late 80’s but he did not dare go further. The Act was amended by the BJP government of Sunderlal Patwa.
As the OBC factor had started emerging in Indian politics, Arjun Singh constituted a one-man commission, with Ramji Mahajan as its chairman, to identify the OBCs in the State. Mahajan did a commendable job in identifying OBCs in each district of Madhya Pradesh and came out with two volumes after working hard for over three years. Arjun Singh made each department of the State government issue notifications reserving 14 per cent of the seats for the OBCs, including in admissions to the medical colleges. A student of Indore medical college challenged the notification and the High Court issued interim injunction in respect of admission to that particular college till further hearing. Arjun Singh promptly made each department of the government issue another notification cancelling the previous one. No effort was ever made to get the interim injunction issued by the Indore bench of the High Court vacated. That was the end of Arjun Singh’s concern for the OBCs.
Arjun Singh had the opportunity to help an OBC become chief minister in 1993. He had even made a promise to Subhash Yadav, a long-time loyalist. Digvijay Singh, PCC chief and a member of Lok Sabha, had publicly announced that he was not in the race for chief ministership. However, Digvijay Singh jumped into the fray at the last moment, ostensibly on an assurance from Arjun Singh who commanded the largest chunk of members in the Congress Legislature Party (CLP). Arjun Singh held a meeting of his supporters at his government-allotted house, drove to the chief minister’s residence where the meeting of the CLP was to be held, declared that his supporters favoured Digvijay Singh and not Subhash Yadav, lamented that his ambition of seeing an OBC as chief minister remained unfulfilled and retired to his Kervan Kothi mansion. Subhash Yadav was literally crying before his friends in a nearby hotel in the evening, shouting repeatedly that this Thakur (Arjun Singh) had always preferred a Thakur on crucial occasions. Could any one believe that any MLA would go against Arjun Singh’s wishes, Yadav was asking.
Fits of megalomania
Though a well-read person with a scholarly bent of mind, Arjun Singh suffered from fits of megalomania. Then he lost perspective and started seeing himself at the centre of the happenings. When he resigned from the Union cabinet and walked out of the Congress in December 1994, he did not have an iota of doubt in his mind that this would lead to exodus from the Congress and, at any rate, the government of Digvijay Singh in Madhya Pradesh would fall in no time. (He had by then developed a special aversion for Digvijay Singh whose elevation to the chief minister’s chair he had facilitated through manoeuvrings a year earlier). But nothing of the sort happened. He and his MLA son Ajay Singh (Rahul Bhaiya) personally rang up each and every MLA belonging to the Arjun Singh camp but hardly half a dozen of them turned up at the Congress (Tiwari)’s national convention at Jabalpur.
It is surprising that many well-meaning people consider the disastrous Rajiv-Longowal accord as an achievement. Arjun Singh, then governor of Punjab, persuaded Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and Harchand Singh Longowal to ‘quietly’ sign the accord. Longowal, who was heading one of the weakest factions in the Akali Dal, was not allowed even to consult his rump of executive; only Balwant Singh, his right-hand man, was permitted to be part of it. Thus half a dozen individuals decide the fate of the troublesome issues like Chandigarh, Sutlej waters and Abohar-Fazilka and ‘direct’ the six crore people of three States (Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan) and the Union Territory of Chandigarh to follow it. Does this happen in a country even with remotely democratic pretensions? Even Indira Gandhi had not been able to resolve these issues. The fate of Rajiv-Longowal accord is now a sad chapter of history.
The Bhopal gas disaster took place during Arjun Singh’s regime. How he had betrayed the victims to serve the interests of Union Carbide Corporation and its executives had already been detailed at length.
Arjun Singh’s ambition was kept alive all these decades by Mauni Baba, a Godman of Ujjain, whose past is as obscure as his ashram where only the privileged few are admitted. Arjun Singh had been a frequent visitor to his ashram. Mauni Baba was said to have always written on the slate “rajyog” for Singh. The Baba does not speak as he had taken a vow of silence (maun). Hence, the appellation Mauni Baba.
Arjun Singh received a shock when P V Narasimha Rao was retrieved from oblivion after Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination and made Prime Minister, with the approval of Sonia Gandhi. Narasimha Rao was then not a Member of Parliament; he had made Arjun Singh the Leader of the House till he was elected to Lok Sabha. Even after that, Arjun Singh remained Number Two (till he quit the cabinet). That was the closest that Arjun Singh had gone to fulfilling his ambition.
But he was not satisfied. Before the Narasimha Rao government was a year-old, Arjun Singh was talking about a “realignment of political forces” which, he told a news agency in an interview, would be very right and healthy (development) for the centrist and left-of-the-centre forces to come together to evolve a broad consensus on national issues. Then came the crux of his interview: “I will like to become the rallying point of the view that Congress should not cut away from its real moorings and remain firmly committed to the ideals of self-reliance, perceived by our great leaders and to our basic ethos”.
Babri demolition
He apparently expected others to take the initiative and make him the rallying point but none came forward. When the Babri issue became hot, some of his colleagues in the party, including then PCC chief Digvijay Singh, were said to have advised him to take the plunge and become a rallying point for the secular forces. He hesitated. When he did quit the cabinet, and the Congress, a few years later, it was too late. His role at the time of the Babri demolition still remains a mystery. He was asked by the Prime Minister four days before the demolition to go and personally see if then Uttar Pradesh chief minister Kalyan Singh’s claim of foolproof security around the mosque was correct. Arjun Singh went to Lucknow, had a tete a tete with Kalyan Singh and returned to Delhi without even visiting Ayodhya or Faizabad.
His quitting the cabinet and the Congress must have been an act of utter desperation because he had done it on the fifth day of his mother’s death. No devout Hindu – and Arjun Singh was a devout Hindu from all appearances — takes any major initiative at least till after 13 days of a death in the family. When a journalist asked him about it at the “terahavin” (the thirteenth day shraddha ceremony) of his mother at his Churhat house, all that Arjun Singh said was that he would come to Bhopal and give his explanation. It never happened.
A curious aspect of Arjun Singh’s actions in that period was his ambivalent attitude towards Sonia Gandhi. Even while out of the Congress, he advertised his loyalty to Sonia Gandhi. At the same time, he was demanding punishment to the recipients of the Bofors pay-off, knowing full well that the Bofors scam was the last thing that Sonia wanted to hear about. Singh told a TV channel in February 1995 that the investigation in the Bofors case should be expedited. “Some names of beneficiaries have already come out and action should be taken against them in accordance with the Indian laws. When some more names come, action should be initiated against them also.”
Palayanvadi
After his failed Congress (Tiwari) experiment, Arjun Singh went back to the Congress to wait for his rajyog. He contested for Lok Sabha from Hoshangabad constituency in 1998. An eminent section of the media reported during the interval between the polling and the counting of votes that there was going to be a hung parliament and Arjun Singh had emerged as the consensus candidate of the non-BJP parties for the post of Prime Minister. When the results came, Arjun Singh had suffered what was the most ignominious defeat of his life, losing in all the eight Assembly segments of the Hoshangabad Lok Sabha constituency.
Though fond of quoting from the Mahabharata’s Arjun to declare that he would neither show cowardice nor run away from the battlefield (na dainyam, na cha palayanam), Arjun Singh of the Congress was wont to run away at the first sign of crisis. One day he says that the decision-taking process in the higher echelons in the Congress is in disarray, and that he finds that the loyalty (in the Congress) is being evaluated from a very limited yardstick. As he is attacked for his utterances by all, including his most ardent supporters like Ajit Jogi and Subhash Yadav, he makes a hasty retreat and pledges his “unflinching loyalty” to the Gandhi family.
In December 1991, (he was then Madhya Pradesh Congress Committee president as well as HRD minister at the Centre), Arjun Singh had announced his decision to launch from the following month an agitation in the State to oust the BJP government of Sunderlal Patwa. The Congress leader had stated that he did not bother about the consequences “once I have taken the decision”. The programme was to hold a demonstration at Kukadeshwar, the native village of Patwa, by defying prohibitory orders, if imposed. Kukadeshwar was selected in view of the desecration of an old mosque allegedly by Patwa’s goons there. A sort of hysteria against the BJP government was built up by Arjun Singh and his party. The Youth Congress activists were asked to carry lathis to meet the police lathis at Kukadeshwar. The administration prepared itself to handle the situation firmly. The forces, including the mounted police, were summoned from the neighbouring districts and buses were requisitioned to transport the agitators to jails. Patwa deputed his trusted cabinet colleagues to take charge of the situation there.
As the crescendo nearly reached a climax, Arjun Singh beat a retreat and abandoned the programme of demonstration in favour of an innocuous public meeting, at a place sufficiently away from Kukadeshwar. The State government responded by dismantling its own preparations. Singh, in his speech, criticised the Patwa government rhetorically but made no demand for its ouster, nor did he spell out the objective of the party’s agitation which he said would continue at different levels till March. To give a farcical touch to the entire show, Arjun Singh later asked then State home minister Kailash Chawla: “I hope there was nothing improper in my speech”.


May 2024
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Blog Stats

  • 202,167 hits