Posts Tagged ‘Ajay Singh’
The mother-son duo may now consider leasing out State Congress units to the highest bidders for specified periods, with the understandable clauses incorporated in the agreement, such as, no criticism, in any form, of mother and son will be permitted, full weightage will be given to the advice of the ‘controlling authority’ (meaning high command in Delhi) in the selection of candidates for Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha, certain quotas will be fixed for the high command in the selection of candidates for Assemblies, and so on. This will bring, on a regular basis, good amounts of funds to the coffers in AICC. More importantly, it will check waywardness presently witnessed in State Congress units all over the country. In any case, the State party bosses are running the organisation as if it has been leased out to them with the minus point that others in the State do not accept it.
It’s now ages that one has seen a State unit of the grand old party working in cohesion anywhere in the country, or the high command taking any firm steps to ensure at least a semblance of unity in the party. Not infrequently, the high command has shown utter unconcern for the workings in the State units. Take, for instance, the matter of Leader of Opposition in the Madhya Pradesh Assembly. The rules prescribe that a meeting of the party MLAs will be convened specifically for the election of the Leader. A formal resolution will be adopted for the purpose. Election may be unanimously or by a majority vote. The copy of the resolution will be communicated to the Speaker of the Assembly in a prescribed manner. The Speaker announces his approval in the Assembly. Then only he/she becomes Leader of Opposition.
In Madhya Pradesh, an observer of AICC or the AICC general secretary in charge of Madhya Pradesh gets signatures of party MLAs on a single-line resolution authorising Sonia Gandhi to name the Leader. The general secretary in-charge then gets the signature of Sonia Gandhi and a copy of that is sent to the Speaker somehow and the Speaker promptly gives his approval. This happened in the last Assembly when Ajay Singh (Rahul Bhaiya) was the ‘Leader of Opposition’ and this happened in the present Assembly when Satyadev Katare is the ‘Leader of Opposition’. On both the occasions, even after getting Sonia Gandhi’s approval, it was not felt necessary to convene a meeting of MLAs to fulfil the formality of adopting the required resolution. If the Speaker did not point out the irregularities in election of the Leader and in communication to the Speaker, it was because it suited the ruling BJP.
The MLAs do not give due regard to the Leader because they feel they were not directly involved even in the so-called election, with the result that the Leader keeps gets his substantial perks as Leader of Opposition, hobnobs with the ruling bosses who are always eager to please him and his small coterie. MLAs work almost independently in the Assembly, sometimes even working at cross purposes. Occasionally meetings of Legislature Party are convened to discuss ‘party strategy’ in the House but only rarely a concerted effort of the party was seen to corner the government.
In Punjab, Captain Amarinder Singh has been made the PCC chief, not for his life-long dedication to the Congress or that he enjoys support and confidence of all party activists. He has been hopping between Congress and Shiromani Akali Dal and had been a votary of the Anandpur Sahib Resolution seeking ultimately a separate Khalistan and later was signatory to the succession document known as Amritsar Declaration after the 1984 storming of the Golden Temple to flush out the Bhindrawale gang of terrorists. A scion of the powerful erstwhile kingdom of Patiala, he is a dashing politician, has money and knows how to use that. But he would not allow other party chiefs to function and when he is the party chief he wants total loyalty like a former Maharaj of Patiala which all Congress leaders cannot do. Those who have been removed from positions because of him feel particularly piqued at his style of functioning.
The Captain’s clout
His clout can be gauged from the facts that the Congress party lost Assembly elections twice under his stewardship, held, in an interview to The Indian Express, Rahul Gandhi’s ‘divisive policies’ within the party for the debacle of the Congress in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. The paper quoted him as having said, ‘I told him pre-2012 that ‘You will divide each village, which will have its own Youth Congress, and that means it will get divided right to the top; even parents take sides in such a situation, we will have problem’. He didn’t listen and that is exactly what happened’.
Anyone else, if he had said such things about Rahul Gandhi, would have been shown his place. But not the Captain. He has been made the PCC chief to run not the Congress party but his own faction as he is doing now on the eve of the Assembly elections.
With a similar mindset, Digvijaya Singh, too, does not allow anyone to run the party smoothly. When Arun Yadav was made PCC chief he started his job with apparent enthusiasm. At the first meeting of PCC, Jagdish Yadav, PCC secretary and a friend of Arun Yadav, described as inauspicious the name of Digvijaya Singh. He was promptly suspended, which gave a clear message to the party workers that new PCC chief Arun Yadav would not tolerate ‘indiscipline’ by any party leader or worker, even though he may be his personal fried. However, before the day was out, Digvijaya Singh called Arun Yadav (and also made it public) that suspension of Jagdish Yadav should be revoked as he (Jagdish Yadav) was a dedicated Congressman. Many Congressmen were surprised to know Digvijaya Singh’s latest views about Jagdish Yadav because he was never known to have liked Jagdish Yadav or any Yadav leader for that matter. Thus snubbed publicly even for working in the party interest, Arun Yadav lost whatever zeal he had and started on the safe path of running his own faction in the party and, in the process, inviting unsavoury allegations. The party high command was not concerned.
When Suresh Pachauri was PCC chief in Madhya Pradesh, (the late) Jamuna Devi was the Leader of Opposition. A rival Congress leader of Jamuna Devi from her Dhar district brought 200 persons to Bhopal. They held a demonstration against Jamuna Devi and presented a memorandum to Pachauri seeking removal of Jamuna Devi. Pachauri entertained them properly, gladly accepted the memorandum and assured them that he would take it to the Congress president. Irrespective of whether he took it to the Congress president, the party high command never tried to stem the rot. The two continued in their separate ways, often working against each other. However, Jamuna Devi never betrayed the party interests. Pachauri did with impunity.
Uttarakhand and Assam are recent history. The Congress high command never tried to stem the rot which had long been going on in the two States. If the Congress government was saved in Uttarakhand, it was because of judicial intervention for which Arun Jaitley (read Modi government) is seething with anger and must be thinking of some ways to show the Judiciary its place. Assam has slipped away from the hands of Congress. Now it fears the crisis of existence in the entire North-East as well as in the South Indian States where high command has never stepped in to bring the warring groups within the party together.
The Maihar Assembly by-election result has boosted the sagging morale of Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, shattered the dream of Ajay Singh to emerge as the Congress leader of Vindhya region and debunked the myth spread by the Arun Yadav camp about the resurgence of Congress in the State after the party’s victory in the Ratlam lok Sabha constituency.
The by-election, held on February 13, was caused by the resignation of Narayan Tripathi who had won from there as Congress candidate in 2013 but had later joined BJP and resigned his Assembly seat. He was fielded by the BJP as its candidate against Manish Patel of Congress and 13 others. Manish had contested from the Maihar seat as Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) candidate in 2013. Maihar is part of Satna Lok Sabha constituency.
Chouhan’s confidence was shaken by the defeat of the BJP candidate in the Ratlam Lok Sabha by-election held in November last. The by-election was necessitated by the death of Dileep Singh Bhuria who had won from there in the 2014 Lok Sabha general elections on the BJP ticket. In the by-election, BJP fielded Dileep Singh Bhuria’s daughter Nirmala Bhuria as its candidate. The chief minister, and several of his cabinet colleagues, camped in the constituency for several days during the campaign. Chouhan addressed nearly two dozen rallies in support of Nirmala. When the results came, Kantilal Bhuria of the Congress was declared elected by a convincing margin of around 89,000 votes.
Maihar was crucial for both the parties, the BJP and the Congress. The latter, having registered an impressive victory in the Ratlam Lok Sabha constituency less than three months ago, wanted to continue its winning spree. The BJP, shattered by the defeat in Ratlam, wanted to arrest the further erosion in its support base.
More than that was involved the stake of two individuals, Ajay Singh and Shivraj Singh Chouhan. Ajay Singh, son of former Union minister Arjun Singh, was keen to establish his domination in the party in the Vindhya region. He was the Congress candidate for Lok Sabha from Satna constituency in 2014. Chouhan had ‘managed’ Narayan Prasad Tripathi (then Congress MLA from Maihar Assembly segment of Satna Lok Sabha constituency) who was said to have substantially sabotaged Ajay Singh’s chance of winning. As the party was mulling action against Tripathi, Chouhan made him join the BJP and resign from the Assembly with the promise that he would ensure his entry into the Assembly on the BJP ticket.
Narayan Tripathi who, as Congress candidate, had won by a margin of around 7,000 votes in 2013, recorded a victory by a margin of over 27,500 votes as BJP candidate this time.
Arun Yadav, after his brief and not-so-glorious stint in the Union Cabinet, was appointed PCC chief in January 2014. Senior leaders of the faction-ridden Congress in the State never took him seriously and he has also not shown any appreciable skills in trying to enlist their support. He, though, has the full support of AICC general secretary and in-charge of Madhya Pradesh affairs Mohan Prakash. The duo, however, could neither take steps to enthuse the demoralised party workers nor could they establish a comfortable working relationship with the media at large. It is a moot point if the Maihar verdict will make the party high command sit up and take notice of the party affairs in Madhya Pradesh.