ndsharma's blog

Warren M Anderson died on September 29 at a nursing home in Vero Beach, Fla. He was 92. His death, however, became a public knowledge only a month later when The New York Times reported it on October 30.

His death passed almost unnoticed until an article appeared in Vero Beach 32963, the weekly newspaper of the Vero Beach barrier island, says NYT.

A Brooklyn carpenter’s son, Anderson ascended to the top of the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) which is remembered in India more for the world’s worst industrial disaster as the leak of poisonous gas from its plant in Bhopal in December 1984 killed thousands and afflicted with multiple ailments lakhs of others. A large number of the victims are still not able to cope up with life.

Anderson was never brought to book for his role in the tragedy, in spite of summonses and warrants issued by Indian courts several times. The only time he visited Bhopal after the tragedy, he was treated by then chief minister of Madhya Pradesh Arjun Singh as the most honoured guest (rather than an accused) and allowed by then Rajiv Gandhi government to fly out of the country.

In fact, such was the clout of Anderson that he virtually owned the government, as well as the judiciary, of India. The Prime Ministers and judges including Chief Justices of the Supreme Court behaved like his paid servants. The whole UCC episode in India marks a period of shame in this country. Perfidy of the Indian politicians, bureaucrats and judges may not be as much evident in any other case as in the case of Union Carbide disaster.

The BJP government of Madhya Pradesh has done what the BJP-appointed Governor had adroitly prevented the Congress government of Digvijaya Singh from doing — taking away the autonomy of the State’s universities. Now the universities in the State are, for all practical purposes, an extension of the Higher Education Department of the State Government.

An Amendment to the Madhya Pradesh Universities Act, 1973, approved by the Assembly in July, adds three Sub-Sections to Section 49-A, thereby empowering the State government to appoint members of the teaching staff, Class 3 and 4 employees and transfer the members of the teaching staff or non-teaching employees from one university to another university. Besides, this will be binding on all universities, the amended Sub-Section say.

Digvijaya Singh had also tried to bring the State’s universities under Government control, though, in a different and subtle way. The Amendment he had got the Assembly to pass aimed at transferring the powers of the Governor (in his capacity as Chancellor) to the State Government simply by substituting the word “Chancellor” with the “State Government”. The Sections of the Act sought to be amended were 6,10,12,13,14,15,20,24,34,48 and 52.

The effect of the amendment would that the power of the universities to create new posts of teaching were subjected to the prior approval of the State Government. Similarly, the universities would no more be able to appoint, for a specified period, to the teaching posts those who were working in other universities or institutions except with the prior approval of the State government. The State Government would, under the amended law, have the power to order an inquiry on its own into the buildings, laboratories, museums, workshops, or into the matters relating to teaching, examinations or finances of the universities — this power vested in the Chancellor.

The Governor then was Dr Bhai Mahavir, a founder-member of the Jana Sangh and one of the few upright Governors the State has had. He knew that the Governor could not refuse his assent to the Bill nor could he withhold it indefinitely but he can definitely seek certain clarifications. He devised his own method to stop this encroachment on the autonomy of the universities.

After he received the Bill for his assent, he sent it back to the Government with some queries. At the same time, he sent copies of the Bill to some eminent persons to convey to them what the Madhya Pradesh government was doing. It was apparently the protest letters received by Digvijaya Singh that dampened his zeal. His government did not pursue it.

Perhaps the harshest comment came from Justice R S Sarkaria, former judge of the Supreme Court and also chairman of the former Commission on Centre-State Relations. Calling the bill “a retrograde step”, Justice Sarkaria wrote to the Chief Minister that the universities in the states are “autonomous, statutory bodies which, as a rule, should be kept free from political influence”.

Justice Sarkaria’s communication further said: “it is well settled that the Governor’s functions while acting as Chancellor of a University do not fall within the purview of Article 163(1) of the Constitution. In other words, while discharging his functions as Chancellor of the University, he is not bound to act on the ‘aid and advice’ of his Council of Ministers”.

Governor as Chancellor

Justice Sarkaria said that the role of the Governor as Chancellor of a university was considered by the Commission on Centre-State Relations. He then quoted the relevant para from the Commission’ Report (rendered in 1987): “In relation to the exercise of executive power of a State, the word ‘Governor’ can normally be equated with the State Government. However, the office of Chancellor, even though held by the Governor under a statute in an ex-officio capacity, cannot be so equated. The former, being an officer of the University, is not obliged to seek the advice of the State Government in the matter of exercise of his functions as the appointment of Vice-Chancellor”.

The others who sent protest letters to Digvijaya Singh on this issue included Justices V R Krishna Iyer, former Judge of the Supreme Court, Soubhagyamal Jain, former Judge of Rajasthan High Court, D V Sehgal and Jeetendra Veer Gupta, former Judges of Punjab and Haryana High Court, and N C Kocchhar, former Judge of Delhi High Court.

Now all that has been nullified by Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s government with one stroke. Wonder if Digvijaya Singh thanked him for achieving what he wanted but could not because of a Governor appointed by the BJP-led NDA government.

Congress lost the Lok Sabha elections for the first time in 1977. During the Emergency that preceded the elections, Indira Gandhi had literally abdicated her authority as Prime Minister to her younger son Sanjay Gandhi who was petulant, had little regard for law and had been dubbed as the ‘unconstitutional authority’ in the Indira Gandhi regime.
If the Congress barely mustered 44 members in Lok Sabha in 2014, the blame is put by many Congress leaders – openly by some and in hushed tones by others – on Rahul Gandhi, son of Congress president Sonia Gandhi. Here are accounts of two persons, one close to Indira Gandhi and the other to Sonia Gandhi, on how they perceived the roles of Sanjay Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi.
B K Nehru, ICS and an outstanding administrator and diplomat, was not only a cousin of Indira Gandhi but also her close adviser on internal and foreign affairs. Captain Amarinder Singh, now Deputy Leader of Congress Parliamentary Party (CPP) and former chief minister of Punjab, has had close and prolonged association with (late) Rajiv Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi.

SANJAY GANDHI
I did discuss Sanjay’s doings with Rajiv. He was as discontented, disgusted and depressed with what was happening as was everybody not belonging to the small clique of Sanjay’s buddies and supporters. I asked Rajiv why his mother allowed all this to happen; he said that the fact was that she had abdicated in favour of her son. She exercised none of the powers of the Prime Minister, they had all been delegated to Sanjay. From what I myself had seen it seemed that she was operating as if she were the President and the Foreign Minister. It seemed that she did not know what was happening inside the country. Fori Nehru ( B K Nehru’s wife), not as circumspect as myself… had no hesitation in telling her (Indira Gandhi) of what she had heard in Chandigarh about the compulsory sterilisation of young boys and old men and of the discontent this was causing. To this Indira’s answer was to take her head in her hands and say ‘What am I to do? What am I to do? They tell me nothing.’
–B K Nehru in in his memoirs ‘Nice Guys Finish Second’, quoted by Natwar Singh in his autobiography ‘One Life Is Not Enough’

RAHUL GANDHI
I tried my best at that stage to tell him (Rahul Gandhi) that do not do these elections (inner-party experiments). I spoke to the Congress president, who, too, spoke to him. But he had made up his mind that something had to be put in place and shouldn’t be interfered with. I told him pre-2012 that ‘You will divide each village, which will have its own Youth Congress, and that means it will get divided right to the top; even parents take sides in such a situation, we will have problem’. He didn’t listen and that is exactly what happened.
…She (Priyanka Gandhi) and Rahul have their own abilities and together they can make a very good team to help the Congress president. I have known them since they were children because they studied with my daughter and son. Priyanka is a very determined young lady, you saw the way she carried herself when her grandmother died and when her father died…I have never worked with Rahul because he takes care of the Youth Congress only, though he has been the vice-president for some time.
–Captain Amarinder Singh in ‘Idea Exchange’ in The Indian Express of June 15, 2014

November 2014
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

People lost faith in Communists

Communists were vanquished because people lost faith in them. They talk big but it never reflected in their work. And yet the leaders are yet to realise that they are fast losing their grip.

--- JUSTICE (RETD) V R KRISHNA IYER

Twitter Updates

Archives

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 21 other followers

Share this blog


Subscribe

Blog Stats

  • 79,351 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.